What technical SEO covers
The parts that carry real weight, and what goes wrong in each.
Can it be crawled and indexed
Everything else is downstream of this. A stray noindex tag, a robots.txt rule shipped from staging, a page reachable only through a script a crawler will not run. Each of these makes pages invisible while your site looks perfectly fine in a browser. This is the highest-severity category on the page and it is checked first, every time.
One page, one address
The same content reachable at several URLs, with and without www, HTTP and HTTPS, with a trailing slash and without, plus a print version. Now search engines have to guess which is real, and they may not pick the one you would. Canonicals and consistent redirects settle it. This is the most common quiet fault in small business sites.
Structure a person could describe
Pages organised so that the relationship between them is obvious, with real internal links between related things. If your important pages are reachable only from the footer, you are telling search engines they are afterthoughts, and it is a reasonable thing for them to conclude.
Redirects that are not a maze
Years of edits leave chains: A goes to B goes to C. Or worse, loops, or old links pointing at 404s that nobody has looked at since a redesign. Every one of those is link value leaking.
Metadata and structured data
Titles and descriptions that are accurate and distinct, and markup that describes what the page actually contains. Both are about being understood correctly, not about tricking anything. Duplicate titles across a site are a signal that nobody looked.
Rendering and speed
If a page needs to run a lot of code before its content exists, you are relying on the crawler to execute it. That mostly works and it is a dependency you did not need. Speed sits here too, though its influence is modest: see speed optimization for why we will not sell that to you as a ranking fix.